I will try to prove the simple, common-sensical reasonableness of the pro-life case by a sort of Socratic logic. My conclusion is that Roe v. Wade must be overturned, and my fundamental reason for this is not only because of what abortion is but because we all know what abortion is.
This is obviously a controversial conclusion, and initially unacceptable to all pro-choicers. So, my starting point must be noncontroversial. It is this: We know what an apple is. I will try to persuade you that if we know what an apple is, Roe v. Wade must be overthrown, and that if you want to defend Roe, you will probably want to deny that we know what an apple is.
Sunday, June 14, 2015
"The Apple Argument Against Abortion" By Dr. Peter Kreeft
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A 13 year old kid has a few items on his shopping list
A 13 year old kid has a few items on his shopping list: Beer ❌ Cigarettes ❌ Racy Magazines ❌ Lottery Tickets ❌ Gun — No Problem! Another ...
-
...are now up and running at The Inclusive Christian Discussion Forums on Yuku. I'm hoping it will prove a place of intelligent and (...
-
]Written in response to a Jewish-Christian friend's response to A Peek into Fetal Memory: Learning in Utero by Prison Fellowship preside...
-
I will do all I can (which admittedly isn't much) to elect Hillary Clinton as the next President of the United States and will vote for...
No comments:
Post a Comment